Page 18 - merged
P. 18

Dominigue Pestre
        Dominique Pestre has been trained as a physicist and as historian. He
        extensively wrote on the history of XXth Century physics, notably in France,
        on the history of high-energy physics and CERN, and on the history of the
        science-military relation. He is current/y working on an history of operational
        research in the United Kingdom during the war, on an history of the building
        of the French nuclear deterrence system. He made his whole carrer at the
        CNRS, Paris and was elected as Directeur d'Etudes at EHESS (Ecole des
        Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales) some years ago. He is director fo the
        Centre Alexandre Koyré for the history of sciences and technology.


        Abstract: New large accelerators in the World in the Forlies and ear/y
        Fifties

        The decision-making processes for the main particle accelerators built
        throughout the world from the 1930s to the 1960s.                     .
        This paper presents half a dozen stories involving protons and physicists,
        electron accelerators and high politics. The aims of the study are two-fold.
        The first is to offer a series of historical analyses describing how decisions
        were arrived at concerning some of the largest accelerators constructed from
        the 1930s to the 1970s throughout the world. Accelerators are the basic tools
        of what many consider to be the most fundamental physics undertaken during
        the last half century, and they are expensive and technically complex
        machines.
        My second aim is to reflect upon the decision-making processes as they
        occur in XXth Century big physics. «8pontaneously», I would say, one might
        be tempted to imagine such processes as being of a linear, rational,
        «scientific» kind -- the final decision resulting from an exhaustive analysis of
        ali possible solutions and of their relevance for the unresolved problems of
        physics. My study belies the systematic dominance of such a process an
        suggest, on the contrary, the playing out of different logics of a completely

        different kind.
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23